Environmental Warfare and Climate Change - HAARP

According to Michel Chossudovsky of GlobalResearch.ca :

"The November 2005 Montreal Conference on Climate Change will focus exclusively on global warming. The debate on climate change will center on formal measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.
The underlying consensus is that greenhouse gas emissions constitute the sole cause of climate instability.
Neither the government delegations nor the environmental action groups participating in the November 2005 Montreal venue, have raised the issue of "weather warfare" or "environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)." for military use.
Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use is no longer part of the UN agenda on climate change."

Why is the military use of of climatic manipulations no longer a part of the conference, especially considering the technology available? I have no idea but it seems strange that the whole world is quiet on this issue, especially considering that this could in fact be the ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction.

The weapon has a name and an owner. The name is HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) and the owner is the US Air Force and the US Navy.

What exactly is HAARP? The official explanation can be found here and here: "HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes."

As Michel Chossudovsky points out:

"In February 1998, the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public hearings in Brussels on the U.S based weather warfare facility developed under the HAARP program. The Committee's "Motion for Resolution" submitted to the European Parliament:

"Considers HAARP... by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body...; [the Committee] regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration... to give evidence to the public hearing ...into the environmental and public risks [of] the HAARP program." (European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy, Brussels, doc. no. A4-0005/99, 14 January 1999).

The Committee's request to draw up a "Green Paper" on "the environmental impacts of military activities", however, was casually dismissed on the grounds that the European Commission lacked the required jurisdiction to delve into "the links between environment and defense". Brussels was anxious to avoid a showdown with Washington. (see European Report, 3 February 1999)."

More information:

Background on the HAARP Project

HAARP Detection and Imaging of Underground Structures Using ELF/VLF Radio Waves

Selected Articles
Weather War? - by The Daily Express - 2005-10-08
The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: "Owning the Weather" for Military Use - by Michel Chossudovsky - 2004-09-27
Climate Change and Geoengineering - by Wayne Hall
Weather Modification a Long Established, Though Secretive Reality - by Mary-Sue Haliburton - 2005-09-11
Threat of U.S. Geophysical Weapons Faces Mankind - by Vladimir V. Sytin - 2004-09-20
Washington's New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change - by Michel Chossudovsky, 2001-01-01
Environmental Warfare and US Foreign Policy: The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction - by Scott Gilbert - 2004-09-23

LINK TO MONTREAL UNFCC CONFERENCE

Russian parliament concerned about US plans to develop new weapon
From Wikipedia
BAE SYSTEMS RECEIVES $35 MILLION FOR HAARP PROGRAM

The Military's Pandora's Box